Tool · Prior art search
Assessing the risk of a trademark filing, in five steps.
The firm has developed an internal tool that queries the EUIPO, INPI and WIPO databases, detects visual, phonetic and textual similarities, and produces a scored report alongside the firm's legal analysis. Visual walkthrough of the five steps below.
Showcase · animations
The five steps, in motion.
Non-interactive visual preview. The full report is delivered case by case, on request.
- 01 / 05
Trademark input
The candidate trademark is entered with its typography, logo and Nice classes. The system maps the Nice classes and suggests the relevant geographic scope, subject to the lawyer's validation.
- 02 / 05
Orthographic variants
Automated generation of variants — letter substitutions, inversions, common prefixes and suffixes — and database queries (EUIPO / INPI / WIPO) for each.
- 03 / 05
Visual comparison
Algorithmic analysis of nearby figurative trademarks — glyph similarity, palette overlap, graphic structure.
- 04 / 05
Phonetic comparison & Nice classes
Phonetic similarity detection (French, English), filtering by Nice classes, highlighting potential overlaps in goods and services.
- 05 / 05
Scoring & report
Compilation of a structured report — synthesis, table of nearby marks, risk scoring per dimension, flagged issues. Report provided alongside the firm's legal analysis before the filing decision.
Before a filing
Have your trademark project checked.
Scoring request through the firm prior to an EUIPO or INPI filing. Report delivered within 5 working days.
Request a scoring